I sat
on a panel at a job-search-advice event alongside a career placement person, a
professor and a search guy, also known as a third-party recruiter. I have tons
of headhunter friends and I may have even dated a recruiter or two somewhere
along the way, but my fellow panelist that night was not someone the
international brotherhood of headhunters would have chosen to speak on its
behalf.
"When I call you or when another recruiter calls you on the
phone, you pick up the phone," said my fellow panelist menacingly to the
crowd. "We represent your best chance of getting a job." I sat
quietly in my seat with a pasted-on smile on my face as the search guy berated
the audience of job-seekers.
"We represent jobs, so don't hang up on us, and when we ask
you for a referral to a friend of yours, give us the referral. You're going to
need a headhunter someday, believe me," the punk headhunter went on. I
started reciting the U.S. presidents in my mind to keep from stabbing the guy
with my dinner fork. Washington. Adams. Jefferson. Madison. Monroe?
The search guy told the crowd how people like him go
unappreciated by undeserving job-seeking slobs such as themselves. Well, I
thought to myself as the panel concluded, that was painful, but at least I got
a story out of it.
I have beloved headhunter friends, as I said. Third-party search
is a critical part of the talent value chain, in my book, and when I was a
corporate HR chief I relied on my search partners to a huge degree. My bros Bob
and Steve in Chicago easily brought in 25% of the brilliant tech guys (a unisex
term) who made U.S. Robotics grow from $17 million to $2.5 billion in sales
while I was working there.
You have to have an outside person involved in a search in many
cases, especially for some of the most-critical positions you hire for. There
is something about the employer-candidate tango that screams for the
participation of a mediating third party. I never felt that the recruiters I
worked with earned a penny less than what they got paid. When you have that
kind of partnership going, you see the value of a trusted search partner
relationship close up. It works the same way on the other side of the equation,
for job-seekers. I know brilliant people who have made all their job moves
through one trusted search partner for twenty years or longer.
That being said, the guy who sat next to me on that panel from
hell told a lie. Job-seekers don't need headhunters any more than headhunters
need them.
The dude on the panel was speaking out of fear -- trying to
spook job-seekers into thinking he holds a magic key to their success. My
friends in the search biz would groan if they heard that. This is a big part of
the negative association some people have with recruiters, in fact - the
mistaken belief that headhunters have magical powers to get people hired,
powers they can use if they like a job-seeker and withhold if they don't.
Headhunters don't have any special ability to get people hired.
When you work with a recruiter, you're saying "Go ahead and represent me.
I know you don't owe me a job and you don't guarantee me one." That is the
deal. Search people work for employers, not for you, so don't expect them to
provide free career coaching, any more than what's required to get your resume
ready for the talent market.
Search
people only have one way to make money, and that is by getting their candidates
hired. If a search person calls you, your first question will be "How many
people have you placed with this employer - the one you're calling me about
today - in the past 12 months?" Unscrupulous search people are famous for
throwing resumes at employers they have no relationships with, just to try and
get a toehold.
That's bad for you, if you are one of the candidates who resume
is being tossed about, because once a headhunter puts your resume into the
employer's system that company is obligated to pay him a search fee if they
hire you. By arriving through the search channel versus approaching the
employer on your own, you become 25% more expensive to the employer (a typical
search fee being 25% of the first year's comp plan). That makes you less
appealing for many opportunities, not more!
Once you get the answer you
want to your first question ("I've actually placed seven people in this
client in the past year - I talk with them at least once a week") your
next question will be "How many people have you placed in the past 12
months for this
hiring manager?" Just because a headhunter puts lots of hires into an
organization doesn't mean he or she has any traction with a particular manager.
You are not bait to be squished onto a fishhook so that your guts come spilling
out. You don't want to be represented by a search person who has no juice with
the one guy we care about -- your hiring manager, a/k/a With Luck Your Next Boss.
If you decide to proceed with a
search partner, specify in writing that you must give written approval every
time the headhunter wants to send your resume out. Tell the search guy that you
expect to hear from him or her at least once a week when your resume is in
play for an opportunity - whether there is any news or not.
You
could think of a headhunter like a real estate agent who's listed your house
for sale. "I'll call you when something worth reporting happens"
doesn't cut it. Every headhunter has competitors, and if the search person
you're working with goes radio silent on you just when you're dying for news,
that's a sign you can do better in the search-partner department.
One last bit of advice: don't go in search of headhunters to
help you find a job unless you know your experience is what the market is
looking for. Most new college grads, for instance, are not search-friendly
candidates, because employers can find tons of new grads to hire when they need
them. They don't need to pay a 25% premium to find new graduates, except in a
few techie or specialized majors.
Unless a kid has a degree in
nuclear engineering or another hard-to-find diploma, the kid is better off
conducting the job search the old-fashioned, self-service way.
Remember, the next time a headhunter calls you: any song and
dance routine you get that smacks of "You need me, bucko" is pure
bluster, a sign that the person on the other end of the phone is trying to
browbeat you into giving up your resume. Don't be fooled by that.
You hold the cards in this equation, no matter how stridently
anyone tries to tell you differently. If you're wavering, ask yourself this
question: Why would a headhunter call me out of the blue if he didn't need my
resume to get a sale? Stay in your power, remember what you bring, and keep
talking to search partners until the right one comes along.
No comments:
Post a Comment